page 1 page 2 page 3 page 4 page 5 page 6 page 7 page 8 page 9 page 10 page 11 page 12 page 13 page 14 page 15 page 16 page 17 page 18 page 19 page 20 page 21 page 22 page 23 page 24 page 25 page 26 page 27 page 28 page 29 page 30 page 31 page 32 page 33 page 34 page 35 page 36 page 37 page 38 page 39 page 40 page 41 page 42 page 43 page 44 page 45 page 46 page 47 page 48 page 49 page 50 page 51 page 52 page 53 page 54 page 55 page 56 page 57 page 58 page 59 page 60 page 61 page 62 page 63 page 64 page 65 page 66 page 67 page 68 page 69 page 70 page 71 page 72 page 73 page 74 page 75 page 76 page 77 page 78 page 79 page 80 page 81 page 82 page 83 page 84 page 85 page 86 page 87 page 88 page 89 page 90 page 91 page 92 page 93 page 94 page 95 page 96 page 97 page 98 page 99 page 100 page 101 page 102 page 103 page 104 page 105 page 106 page 107 page 108 page 109 page 110 page 111 page 112 page 113 page 114 page 115 page 116 page 117 page 118 page 119 page 120 page 121 page 122 page 123 page 124
|
AVIATION093 additional revenues through economic instrumentsunder the guise of climate change. Europe's zeal toinclude aviation into its emissions trading schemefrom 2012 is a perfect example of an economicmeasure that is not globally coordinated.The industry agrees that some form of economicmeasures will play a transition role in capping andeventually reducing aviation's emissions - untiltechnology can deliver longer-term solutions. But thesemust be globally harmonised. Overlapping andduplicative national and regional schemes risk carbonleakage and negating the emissions reduction effectsthey are designed to bring about.The inclusion of aviation in the European UnionEmission Trading Scheme in addition to the UK's AirPassenger Duty is a prime example. Airlines shouldpay their fair share - once. Not several times over.Aviation has every incentive to reduce fuel burn andthereby its emissions. The industry's fuel bill in 2009exceeded US$100 billion. That is a quarter of ouroperating costs. Anything that we can do to reduce fuelburn is a critical contributor to our economic survival.Governments must realise that these taxes and charges- in the absence of global coordination - simply becomepunitive blocks to the industry's efforts. Since 2004,IATA's efforts alone in assisting its members to improveefficiency have saved over 70 million tonnes of CO2. DELIVERING RESULTSAnd we are determined to deliver even more carbonsavings with better operations and new technology.Changes big and small are getting passengers to theirdestinations with greater eco-efficiency. IATA hasGreen Teams working directly with airlines to improvefuel management based on global best practices. Over the last year, IATA worked with over 100 airlinesto help them save eight million tonnes of CO2.Measures implemented include everything from betterflight planning to more frequent engine washing andlightening the weight of materials carried on board.Direct routes and reduced delays improve ourenvironmental performance. Over the course of 2009,IATA worked with industry partners, optimised 266 airroutes and the approach procedures at 253 airports.For example, approaching an airport with a continuousdescent, instead of the stepped approach that is mostcommon, can save up to 150 kg of CO2 per landing. And every minute of delays that we can avoid means that 100kg of CO2 is not emitted. In total, these measures saved four million tonnes of carbon emissions in 2009.094AVIATIONTHERE ARE SEVERAL POTENTIAL SOURCE CROPS FORSUSTAINABLE BIOFUELS. FOR AVIATION, JATROPHA,CAMELINA, HALOPHYTES AND ALGAE ARE THE MOST PROMISINGCO2 EMISSIONS WILL REDUCE SIGNIFICANTLY UNDER NEW MEASURESAPPROACHING AN AIRPORT WITH A CONTINUOUSDESCENT CAN SAVE UP TO 150KG OF CO2 PER LANDING |