page 1 page 2 page 3 page 4 page 5 page 6 page 7 page 8 page 9 page 10 page 11 page 12 page 13 page 14 page 15 page 16 page 17 page 18 page 19 page 20 page 21 page 22 page 23 page 24 page 25 page 26 page 27 page 28 page 29 page 30 page 31 page 32 page 33 page 34 page 35 page 36 page 37 page 38 page 39 page 40 page 41 page 42 page 43 page 44 page 45 page 46 page 47 page 48 page 49 page 50 page 51 page 52 page 53 page 54 page 55 page 56 page 57 page 58 page 59 page 60 page 61 page 62 page 63 page 64 page 65 page 66 page 67 page 68 page 69 page 70 page 71 page 72 page 73 page 74 page 75 page 76 page 77 page 78 page 79 page 80 page 81 page 82 page 83 page 84 page 85 page 86 page 87 page 88 page 89 page 90 page 91 page 92 page 93 page 94 page 95 page 96 page 97 page 98 page 99 page 100 page 101 page 102 page 103 page 104 page 105 page 106 page 107 page 108 page 109 page 110 page 111 page 112 page 113 page 114 page 115 page 116 page 117 page 118 page 119 page 120 page 121 page 122 page 123 page 124 page 125 page 126 page 127 page 128 page 129 page 130 page 131 page 132
|
MOBILISING FINANCE067 imidity has never been a hallmark ofgovernment declarations on climatechange. But while governments mayexpress lofty ambitions, many remain shyabout making commitments. This becomes obviouswhen looking at the commitments for emissionreductions in the Copenhagen Accord but it is also true for another essential component of a global climate agreement: finance. THE US$100 BILLION CHALLENGEIndustrialised countries committed in Copenhagen in2009 to generating US$100 billion annually by 2020for financing climate action in developing countries,both on mitigation and adaptation. For this commitment to help meeting the climatechallenge it needs to be predominantly public finance, which can be used to leverage much greateramounts of private finance for a massive shift ofinvestments into low-carbon technologies andinfrastructure. Undoubtedly, US$100 billion per year is a tall sum if itall has to come from cash-strapped governments stillreeling from the financial crisis. Fortunately, government budgets are not the onlysource of public finance. In 2010, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon charged the High-Level AdvisoryGroup on Climate Finance (AGF) to investigate wherethis funding could come from. Their report confirmed that innovative sources ofpublic finance exist, and there is an opportunity now tomove forward with implementing some of them.HOW CAN INNOVATIVE SOURCES FORCLIMATE FINANCE WORK?Innovative sources can be defined as financialinstruments that generate public finance directly,outside government budgets, for international publicgoods - e.g. for climate action. This means that any levy, tax or other revenue would becommitted to specific climate action, and bechannelled through an international body, i.e. theUNFCCC. The sources considered by the AGF included measuresto address international transport, FinancialTransaction Taxes (FTTs), international auctioning ofemissions allowances, and Special Drawing Rightsissued by the IMF.THE TIME FOR CLIMATE FINANCE IS NOW068MOBILISING FINANCESAMANTHA SMITH, LEADER, WWF GLOBAL CLIMATE AND ENERGY INITIATIVE TIllustration: © www.BiggerPicture.dk / Stine Arensbach / WWF" "THE PIECES APPEAR TO BEFALLING INTOPLACE FOR A SOLUTION THAT RESPECTS THEPRINCIPLES ANDPRACTICES OF THE VARIOUS CONVENTIONS,AND ADDRESSESTHE CONCERNS OF DEVELOPEDAND DEVELOPINGCOUNTRIES |