page 1 page 2 page 3 page 4 page 5 page 6 page 7 page 8 page 9 page 10 page 11 page 12 page 13 page 14 page 15 page 16 page 17 page 18 page 19 page 20 page 21 page 22 page 23 page 24 page 25 page 26 page 27 page 28 page 29 page 30 page 31 page 32 page 33 page 34 page 35 page 36 page 37 page 38 page 39 page 40 page 41 page 42 page 43 page 44 page 45 page 46 page 47 page 48 page 49 page 50 page 51 page 52 page 53 page 54 page 55 page 56 page 57 page 58 page 59 page 60 page 61 page 62 page 63 page 64 page 65 page 66 page 67 page 68 page 69 page 70 page 71 page 72 page 73 page 74 page 75 page 76 page 77 page 78 page 79 page 80 page 81 page 82 page 83 page 84
|
66OLYMPIC REVIEWKNOWLEDGE TRANSFERPLANNING FOR LEGACIESCities and local communities benefit from theOlympic Games in many ways - there are the moreobvious ones, such as the venues or improvedinfrastructure, but there are many that are oftenoverlooked. A few examples from Vancouver 2010are an annual arts event, sports programmes forinner-city youth, as well as the skills gained by manypeople in the country. Knowledge Transfer helpsmaximise the positive impact of the Games bypooling wisdom and best practices. Once the Games have been hosted, the OCOGsleave the legacies in the hands of existing publicbodies, such as National Olympic Committees or citycouncils. But planning for these legacies starts at thevery earliest moment and forms a major part of anyOCOG's work. "The vision and legacy that Londonhas set out is in some ways quite forward-reachingin so far as the key emphasis is on inspiring young people," explains Pollard. "There wasn't a huge amount of knowledge transfer content in this area, so we're setting the marker for futureOCOGs to follow." Ultimately, this is what it is all about: to leavecommunities not just a lasting memory of an inspiring and well executed Games, but also amultitude of benefits that enhance people's lives foryears to come. BENEFICIAL PROCESSWith future host cities drawing on the wealth ofknowledge that is available from past Games, theIOC allows OCOGs to make their own preparationsmore efficient and effective, meaning they are ableto deliver the best Games possible. This process has proved invaluable since IOCPresident Jacques Rogge initiated it in 1998 during the preparations for the 2000 Games in Sydney."The process can have real and far-reachingbenefits," says Rogge. "At a time when the world isstruggling to come out of recession, staging one ofthe biggest sporting events in the world cansometimes feel daunting. This is natural. "To be supplied with first-hand knowledge fromthose who have been there before them, however,allows future host cities to make their own projectsas efficient and effective as possible and to gain a great deal of perspective." ?AboveTheVancouver GamesDebriefing, heldin Sochi in June2010, enabledmembers of theLondon, Sochiand Rio OCOGs to learn fromVANOC'sexperiences |