page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92

COLLECTIONS: How would you describe the current state ofjournalism in Canada?Linden MacIntyre: I think that there are a lot of avid and eagerjournalists, but a couple things have diminished. One is the traditionalstorytelling instinct that was part and parcel of most cultures up untilmore modern times. People were once valued for their ability to takeordinary quotidian events, and shape them into stories that revealed alot about a community; delivering news, knowledge and tradition.That's kind of gone by the wayside, having been replaced by moretechnological and more modern forms of communication. People growup now as consumers of entertainment and information delivered bystrangers from places they have a hard time connecting to.C: Are we witnessing the end of investigative journalism?LM: Well, it's in deep trouble. Proprietors are struggling to keep thebottom line in the black and they're looking for ways to spend moneywith the greatest impact. The Toronto Star has decided that there'senormous impact from investigative journalism. Others are saying theycan get equal value from other things. When that starts to happen, youlose the intake of people who are good at it. Those people becomeother things. I've seen two of the best investigative journalists that I'veworked with give up and go to law school.C: How does the newsroom at the CBC differ from more traditional for-profit media outlets?LM: The CBC's a public broadcast but it's a hybrid. It still has to earnmoney in the market like other media. But I believe that we have twoproblems. We have an existential problem, which is that there's anideological scepticism for the need for public broadcasting. Thatideology is sceptical of a lot of public services, and I see the CBC asa public service. The Brits call it Public Service Broadcasting. We callit Public Broadcasting. I wish we'd call it Public Service Broadcastingbecause it is a public service. We should be able to do stuff in ournewsroom, information programming in particular, that others in themarket-driven media can't do because it's too expensive.Unfortunately, being a hybrid, we are vastly underfunded, so we arereliant on the marketplace and on the goodwill of a bunch ofpoliticians who are conservative and who don't see our value. The onlyway they tolerate us is if they get the message from their constituents.So we have to draw a lot of constituents to our programming. We alsohave to satisfy advertisers. That causes us to pander a bit; to tailor theproduct. People nowadays have an unlimited appetite for sex andviolence. They love goofiness. So an awful lot of journalism tends totry to bring in crime and goofiness at the expense of serious publicpolicy examination and discussion.C: So do you still find satisfaction in the job?LM: Sure. I mean it was shocking for me to discover that one year thebiggest audience I got was for a program about an old lady who cruiseddating services to find old guys. Several of them died and she ended upwith their stuff. She was caught, and she allowed me to interview her.But I was startled at the buzz, everyone was talking about the BlackWidow. I was thinking that it was pretty cheesy, but then again, it wasn'tjust a black and white caricature. I tried to bring some insight into thisaspect of human nature... this reinventing yourself. She did it formercenary reasons, but you have to take account of the fact that shegrew up poverty stricken and was probably abused. She grew up tough,and learned that if she was going to survive, she'd have to be creative.So you put all those things in, and try to elevate a crime to a place whereit has some deeper value. So it's possible to deliver the murder of theweek, and at the same time, leave people thinking about humanity.C: How has new media impacted your profession?LM: New media, twitter, the blog, these are tools. They're great tools,but the craftsperson still has to rely on him or herself. You can't letthe tools do everything. Google is wonderful. It used to take weeks totroll through libraries and microfiche to find stuff. I've seen storiesgenerated by virtue of the fact that there's stuff on Facebook wherethe people who put it out there didn't realize it would be used toexpose them. So these are wonderful tools. I think I become crankyong known for his work as co-host of the CBC's award-winning investigativenews program, The Fifth Estate, Linden MacIntyre has been reinventinghimself, and the transition from journalist to author of fiction appears to havecome naturally. Having penned his first novel, The Long Stretch, before theturn of the century and following it up ten years later with 2009's Giller Prize-winningThe Bishop's Man, he is now preparing to close out his trilogy with a new novel,intriguingly titled Why Men Lie. Drawing inspiration from great writers of history likeDickens, Hugo and Steinbeck, Linden has a knack for taking his readers into thedarkest reaches of the human condition, with seldom a false note. But this shouldcome as no surprise. Like his work on The Fifth Estate, MacIntyre's fiction shares thatcommon theme essential to all great journalism: the truth.COLLECTIONS' Jeremy Finkelstein recently sat down with the acclaimed newsmanto discuss the future of investigative journalism, institutional abuse, and Why Men Lie.LWhy Men Lieis published by Random House Canada and is available in bookstores everywhere.45

46when I see people letting the tools do the work. If I'm working with aresearcher that comes in with an unmediated box of stuff,compliments of the Internet and the printer, I say "What the fuck'sthat all about? I could have done that... except I wouldn't. I wouldhave been looking for what I need." I don't need to know everything inthe world about x, y, and z. I'm telling a story; something badhappened to this person, because of this situation, and this person isaccountable. That's the story... that's every story. So Internet tools aregreat, but you've got to know what you're looking for and why you'relooking for it.C: Your novel, The Bishop's Man, won the 2009 Giller Prize. How hasthat changed your life?LM: The part that I like with the Giller is that it moves a book into aspotlight, and gives a good book an opportunity to become asuccessful book. Not all good books are successful books, so becauseof the few spotlights that are available, a handful of lucky writers willfind their book in the spotlight for a given time. It had a remarkableimpact on the book. I've been going to a lot of public events speaking,not so much about the book, but about the issues raised by the book.People still want to talk about the moral dilemmas raised in TheBishop's Man. That's a success for me.C: I read that you'll be going to British Columbia to speak about sexualabuse in the media.LM: Well, I try not to be the go-to guy on sexual abuse. I don't thinkspeeches help. If someone is inclined to be an exploiter of children,they should be treated clinically. If institutions tolerate it, in order toprotect their image, as the Church and the Scouts did, they toleratewhat they consider to be a lesser evil than the evil of disgrace. That'sa different issue. I talk about institutional morality, and it's about allkinds of things. It's about the way people use the cloak of institutionalinterest to justify doing awful things; things that offend their ownpersonal morality. You can start with the big scale of Germany in the`30s, where a whole lot of otherwise decent people said, "Well, I hadno choice. The state requires this of me," the state being the ultimateinstitution. Or the Catholic Church, where bishops tolerated awfulbehaviour by priests because it was determined to be of lesser evilthan the evil of diminishing the reputation of the Church. Or anewspaper that gives an ethical young person a job, and then requireshim to do sleazy things, and he says, "In the interest of my career inwhich I'll do good things, I'll go along with this." How many people atMurdoch's papers, tapping into private messages, were sick to theirstomach but said "I'll get past this. I'll learn from this"? Expediencecan be an awful thing.C: Then you weren't surprised from what we've learned about Penn State.LM: No, and it's not what the man does to the boy in the shower. It'sabout what the person who discovers it does. Joe Paterno's responsewas probably more diligent than most. He held his breath for acouple days, and then went to university officials. A lot of peoplewould have just said, "Oh, Jesus, I've known him all my life. I'll talkto him. I'll wait for an opportunity and find out, is he drinking toomuch? Is he having trouble at home? Is he under stress? That's outof character." You just talk yourself out of calling the cops because theconsequences are a lost friendship, a scandal, a criminal proceeding.It's the same thing. Bishops are told that Father So and So has justdone something awful to an altar boy. Well, the bishop may haveknown that guy since he was a student. He ordained him, knows hisfamily, and if he calls the cops, he's going to create a mess.Protestants will be celebrating, the masons will have a cocktail tocelebrate the downfall of a priest. This is the way they think. "We bestkeep that in the family. We'll deal with it. What do you think is wrongwith him? Well, he's been drinking a lot. Oh, that's the problem."Maybe he's been drinking a lot out of a sense of shame, but they'll saythat because he's drinking, his guard was down and some kid came onto him, or he was put into a situation where he couldn't help himself.There was a bishop in Nova Scotia who actually said, "Let's have somesympathy for the poor men who are being seduced by these wickedchildren." He said it publically! So nothing surprises me about humanbehaviour. What surprises me is how other humans respond when theyfind out that other humans are behaving badly.C: What can we expect from Why Men Lie?LM: It's a story about men and how they behave, and why they behavethe way they behave, told through the experience of a middle-agedwoman who's known a lot of men. She's had a troubled relationshipwith her father, she's had an odd relationship with her brother, twohusbands, and a series of flings. She reaches middle age after havingone last disastrous betrayal, and she reaches that point where shetakes stock and says "I don't need this." But she forgets the fact thatmen need something from her. Once middle age sets in, men needcomplicated things from women, more than women need from men. Itgoes against the notion that some vulnerable women have about beingover the hill and not sexy anymore. Well, rethink that. Maybe they'renot all trying to jump you, but they need far more important things,and they will do anything to get them.C: What advice do you have for the burgeoning writers and journalistsin our audience?LM: Always think about who you're writing for, and about what theyneed and want. I suppose some just want titillation, but most readbooks looking for some insight into human nature. So, first think aboutsomething that you passionately want to tell, and then think aboutwhat the consumer will want to get out of it. A lot of books that areconceived are vanities. Some are successful, some move the goalposts of literature, but the vast majority have failed. For most of us,it's a matter of writing a story that will engage the audience, and leavethem thinking after they've finished reading. That's what the missionshould be and that's the challenge. It's a daunting challenge.People still want to talkabout the moral dilemmasraised in The Bishop's Man.That's a success for me.For more information on Why Men Lie and other works by Linden MacIntyre, please visit randomhouse.ca